Пpоект миpовой Полиси FidoNet (1992),
отвеpгнут голосованием (см. описание в книге)
W O R L D P O L
International FidoNet Policy Document
Version 3
0. Preliminary Note
[This section will automatically be removed upon adoption
of this document.]
This document has been released for vote by the members of
FidoNet and is not yet in force. The Network Coordinators
are encouraged to circulate this document and cast their
votes according to the wishes of the Nodes which comprise
their Networks.
1. Preamble, Purpose, and Scope of This Document
FidoNet is an amateur electronic mail system. As such, all
of its participants and operators are unpaid volunteers
and/or hobbyists. From its early beginnings in 1984 as a
few friends swapping messages back and forth mainly in
North America, it consists now of an International
community of more than 18,000 members worldwide.
FidoNet is not a common carrier or a value-added service
network. FidoNet is a public network only as much as the
independent member Nodes may individually provide public
access to the network via their system. FidoNet has no
corporate legal existence.
FidoNet exists to provide electronic mail services to its
member Nodes. To provide such services efficiently,
various structure and control mechanisms have been
established. The structure and administration of FidoNet
are detailed in this document.
FidoNet is a living thing and changes with the technology
upon which it is based, and with the wishes of its members.
This document is intended to provide for those changes, and
to set only the broadest possible limits upon them.
Accordingly, this document should be interpreted in the
most permissive and general way possible. Only a few
things are deemed so egregious as to be forbidden entirely:
- Discrimination without technical justification
- Tyranny
- Profiteering
1.1. Membership
A member system of FidoNet is commonly known as a "node."
The membership of FidoNet is defined by a list of systems
called the NodeList. The NodeList is published weekly on
the behalf of the International Coordinator and distributed
in whole or incrementally to the entire membership. The
NodeList is a publicly available document.
1.1.1. Admission to Membership
FidoNet membership is open to everyone fulfilling the
technical standards described in a document released by the
network's Technical Standards Committee (FTS-0001 or as
superseded). The only requirements are the ability to send
and receive electronic mail according to the applicable
technical standards, and a willingness to abide by the
relevant policy documents.
1.1.2. Nondiscrimination Policy
Discrimination on other than technical grounds is not
permitted in FidoNet. This means that no restriction other
than the ability to adhere to the applicable technical
standards may be imposed upon those wishing to join.
Members may, however, be suspended or expelled for cause as
set forth in this document.
1.1.3. Encouraging the Growth of FidoNet
The strength and viability of FidoNet increase as its
membership increases. All members are urged to encourage
the growth of the network by helping others to join.
Technical assistance to newcomers should be considered a
primary obligation of membership.
1.2. Availability of This Document
To facilitate the growth of network membership, this
document shall be distributed as widely as possible to
members and prospective members. Anyone wishing a copy may
obtain one. Members are encouraged to make it available in
electronic form to those who access their systems.
1.3. Language
For practical reasons, the international language of
FidoNet shall be English. Individual Zones, Regions, and
Networks may adopt whatever language is most convenient for
them.
The translation of all official documents into as many
languages as possible is encouraged.
1.4. Privacy
The store-and-forward nature of most FidoNet transmissions
does not permit any assurance of privacy. All data
transmitted should be considered accessible to the owners
of all the systems through which it passes. Because in
many jurisdictions the owners of those systems may be held
responsible for the content of such data, encryption for
the sake of secrecy is forbidden; the owner of any system
through which encrypted or encoded data is transmitted is
entitled to the mechanisms for interpreting that data upon
demand.
1.5. Commercial Use
FidoNet is not a commercial enterprise. Incidental use for
commercial purposes, such as customer support or the buying
and selling of merchandise via electronic mail postings, is
allowed. However, no member may be forced to incur any
costs or obligations in order to permit or further such
commercial use. This would constitute profiteering.
1.6. Dues, Fees, and Charges
There are no dues, fees, or charges for membership in
FidoNet. This does not prohibit cost recovery schemes or
other mechanisms for distributing the financial impact of
providing various services; however, no one can be
compelled to participate in such a scheme if they can find
a more appealing alternative.
For example, a group of Nodes may choose to split the cost
of importing files or echomail. They would be within their
rights to refuse to supply files and EchoMail to anyone who
doesn't wish to contribute, BUT they may not forbid or even
discourage anyone from getting their files or EchoMail
elsewhere.
1.6.1. Charges for Required Distributions
As a specific instance, no Coordinator may charge any fee
or recover any costs associated with the distribution of
the official documents and publications of FidoNet, nor for
the routing of inbound Netmail. They may choose, however,
to hold these items for pickup at the recipient's expense.
2. The Structure of FidoNet
The collection of Nodes is ordered into Zones, Regions and
Networks in a hierarchical fashion. A Zone consists of one
or more Regions; a Region consists of one or more Networks.
Each level in the hierarchy may adopt its own policy
document to suit its own needs; however, no policy may
contradict the policy of the higher level.
The organizational structure of FidoNet has been developed
to distribute the administration and control of FidoNet to
the lowest possible level, while still allowing for
coordination of the whole. Although FidoNet is a
hierarchy, with a top down flow of administration, it must
be as responsive as possible to the lowest level, the
individual Node.
2.1. Administrative Responsibility
Each administrative level is responsible to the level
above, and responsible for the level below. If a person at
any level (above the Node) is unable to properly perform
their duties, the person at the next higher level may
replace them by appointment. For example, if a Region
Coordinator is unable to perform his or her duties, then
the Zone Coordinator may appoint an interim replacement.
2.1.1. Duration of Appointed Term
The appointed replacement may serve only until elections
can be held for an elected replacement.
2.1.2. Candidacy of Appointees
The appointed person may run for the office to which they
have been appointed.
2.1.3. Democratic Elections
Elections must be held in accordance with democratic
principles as outlined later in this document.
2.1.4. Creation of New Jurisdictions
In the event of the creation of a new Zone, Region, or Net
the administrative level immediately above shall appoint a
Coordinator pro tempore to serve until an election can be
held for an elected replacement.
2.2. The Zone Coordinator Council
The Zone Coordinator Council consists of the Zone
Coordinators of the several Zones and the International
Coordinator.
Each Zone Coordinator has one vote at the ZCC. The
International Coordinator may only vote in the event of a
ZCC vote tie, but does not regularly have voting power.
The Zone Coordinator Council is the legislative body of
FidoNet, it represents each of the Zones in FidoNet. It is
the highest authority of the Network's top down
organization.
2.2.1. The International Coordinator
The International Coordinator (IC) is the Executive Officer
of FidoNet and coordinates the joint production of the
master NodeList by the Zone Coordinators. The
International Coordinator is responsible for creating new
Zones in FidoNet, but can only do so with the approval of a
simple majority of the members of the Zone Coordinator
Council.
The International Coordinator is selected by unanimous vote
of the Zone Coordinators, and removed by a majority vote of
the Zone Coordinators. In the case of the absence of the
International Coordinator, the Zone Coordinator Council
replaces her/him by voting on all IC resolutions to be
approved by a simple majority.
2.2.2. Zones and the Zone Coordinators
A Zone is a grouping of Regions generally consisting of
several countries, whose borders are determined by the Zone
Coordinator Council.
The Zone Coordinator is the Executive Officer of the Zone,
and the Zone's representative to the other Zones.
The Zone Coordinator compiles the NodeLists from all of the
Regions in the Zone, creates a master NodeList and a
difference file, which latter is then distributed over
FidoNet within the Zone and to the other Zone Coordinators.
The Zone Coordinator must ensure the distribution of the
official FidoNet publications to the Region Coordinators
within the Zone. A Zone Coordinator need not perform
message-forwarding services for any Nodes in the Zone, but
the Zone Coordinator is responsible for the formation
and/or administration of one or more Zone-gates to provide
inter-Zone mail facilities.
2.3. Regions and the Region Coordinators
A Region is a defined portion of a Zone containing Nodes
which may or may not be members of Networks. A typical
Region will contain many Nodes in one or more Networks, and
a few independent Nodes which are not part of the Region's
other Networks.
The Region Coordinator maintains the list of independent
Nodes in the Region, and accepts NodeList segments from the
Network Coordinators in the Region. These are compiled to
create a Regional NodeList, which is sent to the Zone
Coordinator. A Region Coordinator is required to ensure
the distribution of the official FidoNet publications to
the Network Coordinators in the Region. A Region
Coordinator is encouraged to perform message-forwarding
services for Nodes within the Region, but is not forced to,
unless the appropriate Zone or Region policy imposes such a
requirement.
2.4. Networks and the Network Coordinators
A Network is a group of Nodes who coordinate their
administrative and mail activity.
The Network Coordinator is responsible for maintaining the
list of Nodes for the Network, and for accepting NetMail
sent to members of the Network from other FidoNet Nodes.
The Network Coordinator may make arrangements to handle
outgoing NetMail, but is not required to do so, unless the
appropriate Zone, Region or Net policy imposes such a
requirement. The Network Coordinator must ensure the
availability of the official FidoNet publications to all
Nodes within the Network.
The Network Coordinator is required to assign a valid Node
number to each and every qualifying petitioner within 3
weeks from the request. A petitioner may only be deemed
unqualified if she/he cannot meet current FidoNet Technical
Standards. The NC must inform the petitioner of the
grounds for any rejection, and advise them of the procedure
for appealing the decision.
2.4.1. Network Routing Hubs
The Network Coordinator may appoint one or more hubs to
assist in the distribution of mail and documents; the hubs
may also be required to maintain a portion of the NodeList.
Hubs serve at the pleasure of the Network Coordinator, who
remains responsible for their activities.
2.5. Nodes (Individual Systems)
The smallest subdivision of FidoNet is the individual
system, corresponding to one or more entries in the
NodeList. The system operator (SysOp) may or may not
maintain a Bulletin Board System which may or may not be
publicly accessible. The system must be continually
available to send and receive mail in accordance with the
terms of FidoNet membership, and must adhere to the
relevant policies in force at all levels of FidoNet up to
and including this overall Policy.
2.5.1. Users of a System
If a SysOp maintains a Bulletin Board System to which
others have access, the SysOp is responsible for all
activities of those users which impinge upon the rest of
FidoNet. Users have no rights or standing under this
Policy. It is the responsibility of the SysOp to ensure
that all communications originating from the system,
whether posted by the SysOp or a user, comply with FidoNet
Policy.
2.5.2. Points
A Point is a computer system that is not in the NodeList,
but communicates with the rest of FidoNet through a member
Node known as its bossnode. All mail set to a Point is
addressed to the bossnode's address. Points may
communicate with other member Nodes if those Nodes permit
it, but they are not required to do so.
Points have the same status as users of a member system.
Off-line readers are software packages which allow bulk
transfers of mail between a BBS and another computer but do
not offer the full functionality required for FidoNet
membership. Users of Off-line readers are considered to be
users of the BBS from which they obtain their mail.
3. The FidoNet Technical Standards Committee
The FidoNet Technical Standards Committee (FTSC) exists for
the purpose of establishing minimum requirements in
software and hardware which the members of FidoNet must
observe. These minimum requirements must be obeyed at
every level, and systems which cannot meet them are
ineligible for membership in FidoNet.
3.1. Composition of the FTSC
The members of the FTSC are appointed by and serve at the
pleasure of the Zone Coordinator Council.
3.2. Duties of the FTSC
In addition to establishing minimum technical requirements
for membership in FidoNet, the FTSC is also responsible for
promulgating optional standards and for promoting the
advancement of FidoNet technology.
The Zone Coordinator Council may assign other duties to the
FTSC, and the FTSC may assume other responsibilities
subject to the approval of the Zone Coordinator Council.
4. General Procedures for Coordinators
4.1. Distribution of Official Documents
Each Coordinator is responsible for obtaining and making
available for distribution the official documents and
publications of FidoNet. This availability must include
file requests from any and all members of FidoNet. This
availability must extend directly or indirectly to
non-members as well so as to encourage the growth of
FidoNet.
4.1.1. Maintaining a Bulletin Board System (BBS)
Although no Coordinator is required to maintain a publicly
accessible BBS, they are required to ensure that at least
one publicly accessible BBS within their jurisdiction does
make the official documents available upon request to
non-members who are not be able to use file requests.
4.1.2. Official Documents
The list of official documents and publications of FidoNet
may be amended by the Zone Coordinator Council. FidoNet
being an open society, its official documents are available
freely to members and non-members alike; the only
restriction is that no one may be forced to incur a cost
for providing them to another.
4.1.2.1. The Policy
A Coordinator is responsible for making the current version
of the International Policy available to the level below,
and to encourage familiarity with it.
4.1.2.2. The NodeList
The NodeList is the official roster of the FidoNet
membership.
4.1.2.3. The NodeDiff
Since the NodeList is large and will continue to grow, it
is maintained through the distribution of weekly difference
files (the NodeDiffs).
4.1.2.4. FidoNews
FidoNews is the Official Newsletter of FidoNet. Each
Coordinator is responsible for obtaining and making
available for file request on a weekly basis, FidoNews
Documents.
If a Zone Coordinator is not able to get FidoNews into
her/his Zone, he should immediately request help from the
FidoNews Editor. If the Editor can arrange a way to have
it delivered to the Zone Coordinator, FidoNews must be
necessarily available to the rest of the Zone. Otherwise,
the Zone Coordinator may unilaterally waive this
requirement.
4.2. Maintenance of the NodeList
Each Coordinator is responsible for obtaining NodeList
information from the level below, processing it, and
passing the results to the level above. The timing of this
process is determined by the requirements imposed by the
level above.
4.3. Minimize the Number of Hats Worn
Coordinators are encouraged to limit the number of
FidoNet-related Coordinator functions they perform. A
Coordinator who holds two different positions compromises
the appeal and arbitration process. For example, if the
Network Coordinator is also the Region Coordinator, SysOps
in that Network are denied one level of appeal.
Multiple hats are also discouraged due to the difficulty of
replacing services when a coordinator leaves office.
4.4. Be a Member of the Jurisdiction
A Coordinator of whatever level must be a member of that
Coordinator's own jurisdiction. That is, a Network
Coordinator must be a Node within that Network; a Region
Coordinator must be either a Node in a Network within that
Region or an independent Node within that Region; etc.
4.5. Encourage New Members
A Coordinator is expected to actively encourage the health
and growth of FidoNet by ensuring the free availability of
the official documents and publications to non-members, by
offering technical assistance (directly or indirectly)
where possible, and by promptly responding to applications
for membership.
Above all, a Coordinator is expected to be courteous,
helpful, and evenhanded in dealing with both members and
potential members.
4.6. Tradition and Precedent
A Coordinator is not bound by the practices of
predecessors. However, it must be clear that Coordinators
are bound by all requirements of this document, both as
FidoNet SysOps and as Coordinators. The holding of a
Coordinator title does not grant license to annoy others or
to flaunt policy.
4.7. Management of the Jurisdiction
The primary responsibility of any Coordinator is technical
management of Network operations. Decisions should
normally be made only on technical grounds. A Coordinator
has the responsibility to act as objectively as possible;
objectivity must be considered an essential factor when
making a decision.
Decisions based upon other than technical grounds must be
considered extreme measures, to be taken only when no
alternative exists to deal with a situation which threatens
the rights of the membership as outlined in this Policy.
5. Zone Mail Hour
Zone Mail Hour is the heart of FidoNet, as this is when
Network mail is passed between systems. Any system which
wishes to be a part of FidoNet must be able to receive mail
during this time using the protocol defined in the current
FidoNet Technical Standards Committee publication (FTS-0001
at this writing). It is permissible to have greater
capability (for example, to support additional protocols or
extended mail hours), but the minimum requirement is
FTS-0001 capability during this one hour of the day.
This time is exclusively reserved for Netmail. Many phone
systems charge on a per call basis, regardless of whether a
connect, no connect, or busy signal is encountered. For
this reason, any activity other than normal Network mail
processing that ties up a system during ZMH is considered
annoying behavior. User (BBS) access to a system is
prohibited during ZMH.
Zone Mail Hour will be defined by each Zone Policy. In the
absence of a Zone Policy, it will be defined by the Zone
Coordinator.
Zone Mail Hours for all Zones should be published every
week in FidoNews, as well as in the NodeList.
6. Elections and Referenda
Any election or referendum at any level within FidoNet must
comply with the standards described in this section.
6.1. Voter Eligibility
All SysOps who are members of FidoNet have one vote each
and must be allowed to participate in any election or
referendum held within their jurisdiction.
In the case where one SysOp operates more than one Node,
that SysOp may cast only one vote in any election or
referendum.
In the case where more than one person functions as the
SysOp of a Node, the one who is listed in the NodeList
casts a single vote. How they settle this among themselves
is their business.
6.2. Voting Mechanisms
6.2.1. Establishment of Local Procedures
Each jurisdiction may issue its own voting procedures
covering jurisdiction-wide elections and referenda; these
procedures may be embodied in a policy document for the
jurisdiction, or may be ad hoc in the absence a policy
document covering the situation.
6.2.2. Direct or Indirect Voting
Elections may be by direct vote, or by indirect vote with
one or more representatives casting a vote or votes based
upon a direct vote of their constituencies. In the case of
an indirect vote, representation may be proportional or
not.
In any case, all members of the jurisdiction must be
allowed to vote except if it would violate the one-SysOp,
one-vote principle. (Such a case might arise in the case
of a SysOp who maintains Nodes in two different Nets within
the same Region; such a SysOp may cast only one vote in any
Region-wide election or referendum.)
In the case of an indirect election, the electors must be
chosen by direct vote of the SysOps.
6.2.3. Coordinators Acting As Electors
Coordinators may not ex officio serve as electors
representing their Network or Region in an indirect
election unless they have been chosen by direct vote of the
SysOps in the administered area.
6.2.4. Worldwide Elections and Referenda
In worldwide elections and referenda with the participation
of all Zones, the Zone Coordinator Council will determine
the election procedures and whether the vote will be direct
or indirect. This will be done in each particular case by
a ZCC resolution.
6.3. Eligibility for Office
All SysOps in FidoNet are entitled to be candidates to any
elective position, provided that the requirements for each
position described in this and lower-level policy documents
are satisfied.
6.4. Term of Office
By default, the term of office for any elected or appointed
official shall be two years.
6.4.1 Absolute Term Limitations
Zone, Region, or Net policies may extend or shorten this
term of office, but it may not be longer than three years.
6.4.2. Multiple Terms
Unless further restricted by the applicable Zone, Region,
or Net policies, there is no restriction on the number of
consecutive or non-consecutive terms which an official may
serve.
6.5. Policy Referenda
6.5.1. Adopting or Amending the International Policy
A referendum on International Policy modification is
invoked by the International Coordinator at the direction
of a majority of the Zone Coordinators, or a majority of
the Region Coordinators of all Zones, a majority of the
Network Coordinators of all Zones, or by one third of all
the SysOps in all Zones.
All the members of FidoNet are entitled to vote on an
International Policy referendum, which is to be held
according to the procedures described by the Zone
Coordinator Council before the election is called.
6.5.1.1. Transition to a New International Policy
Upon the adoption of a new International Policy, any
previous International Policy is adjourned. Any existing
Zone, Region, or Network Policies must be brought into
compliance with the new International Policy.
6.5.1.2. Affect of Amendments to the International Policy
Upon the adoption of an amendment to the International
Policy, any existing Zone, Region, or Network Policies must
be brought into compliance with the International Policy as
amended.
6.5.2. Adopting or Amending a Zone Policy
A referendum on Zone Policy modification is invoked by the
Zone Coordinator, by a majority vote of the Region
Coordinators in the Zone, by a majority vote of the Network
Coordinators in the Zone, or by one third of all the SysOps
in the Zone.
All the members of the Zone are entitled to vote on a Zone
Policy referendum, which is to be held according to the
procedures described in the Zone Policy. If such document
does not exist, the procedures will be determined by the
Zone Coordinator with the approval of the Zone Coordinator
Council.
6.5.3. Adopting or Amending Region and Network Policies
The formulation of Region and Network Policy documents is
encouraged, and must be allowed by the Zone Policy
documents in each Zone.
7. Primacy of the International Policy
The International Policy holds primacy over all Zone,
Region, and Network Policies.
8. Disputes among Members
The FidoNet judicial philosophy can be summed up in two
rules:
- Thou shalt not excessively annoy others.
- Thou shalt not become excessively annoyed.
Tolerance and consideration of others are expected of all
members.
8.1. Resolution of Disputes
8.1.1. Direct Resolution
Wherever and whenever possible, the parties involved in any
dispute must make a good-faith effort to resolve their
problems directly, without the intervention of a
Coordinator.
Tolerance and consideration of others are expected of all
members.
8.1.2. Arbitration Requests
Any of the parties involved may request the intervention of
the appropriate Coordinator: Network Coordinator if a
dispute between members of the same Network, Region
Coordinator if a dispute between members of different
Networks in the same Region; Zone Coordinator if a dispute
between members of different Regions in the same Zone;
International Coordinator if a dispute between members of
different Zones.
In the event that one of the parties to the dispute is a
Coordinator, then arbitration of the dispute falls to the
level above.
The Coordinator requested to act as "arbitrator" will ask
each party to provide all information relevant to the
request within two weeks from the request being made and
will make a decision within forty-five days after s/he
received all the information from the involved parties.
A Coordinator, unable to resolve a dispute, may name a
third party to act as "arbitrator," provided the parties
involved in the dispute agree.
Tolerance and consideration of others are expected of all
members.
8.1.3. Appeals
An arbitrator's decision may be appealed to the immediately
superior level if considered unfair: Region Coordinators
handle appeals from decisions made by Network Coordinators;
Zone Coordinators handle appeals from decisions made by
Region Coordinators; the International Coordinator handles
appeals from decisions made by the Zone Coordinators; and
the Zone Coordinator Council will handle appeals from
decisions made by the International Coordinator. Decisions
of the Zone Coordinator Council are not subject to appeal.
For appeals of a decision made by a third person named by a
Coordinator to act as arbitrator, it will be as if the
Coordinator made the decision and the previously enumerated
sequence of appealing will be pertain.
For appealing a decision made by a arbitrator, the same
terms and procedures as for any Mediation Request apply.
Tolerance and consideration of others are expected of all
members.
8.1.4. Statute of Limitations
An arbitration request may not be filed more than 60 days
after the date of discovery of the source of the
infraction, either by admission or technical evidence.
Mediation requests may not be filed more than 120 days
after the incident, unless they involve suspected unlawful
behavior, in which the legal statute of limitations of the
country involved shall apply.
Tolerance and consideration of others are expected of all
members. A short memory may help.
8.1.5. Penalties
8.1.5.1. Penalties Applicable to Members
FidoNet is a voluntary association. Accordingly, the only
penalty which may be applied to its members by FidoNet is
the withdrawal of that privilege of association, either
temporarily or permanently. In short, a member may be
suspended or expelled.
8.1.5.2. Penalties Applicable to Coordinators
A Coordinator who abuses the office may be removed from
that office instead of or in addition to suspension or
expulsion from FidoNet.
8.1.5. Legal Actions against Members
Since FidoNet is a voluntary association with no corporate
legal standing, it may neither act against nor on behalf of
its members or administrators in legal actions. Should one
member take or precipitate legal action against another on
a matter which is also subject of a FidoNet action or
appeal, said action or appeal may be settled independently
and without regard for the outcome of the legal action.
8.2. Compliance with Local Laws
Members of FidoNet are expected to be good citizens of
their respective lands. As such, they are expected to
comply with all applicable laws. While failure to comply
with the laws does not constitute annoying behavior in and
of itself, forcing or tricking another into illegal
behavior may. For example, sending unsolicited illegal
matter to another Node and then notifying the police of its
presence would be considered annoying behavior.
9. Other Distribution Services
Although the primary purpose of FidoNet is the distribution
of person to person electronic mail, all jurisdictions are
encouraged to provide for the distribution of other matter
such as EchoMail, files, facsimiles, and anything else of
interest or benefit to the membership.
9.1. Required Distributions
Notwithstanding the above, no SysOp may be required to
carry an EchoMail conference or other distribution service
as a condition of joining or remaining in FidoNet, with the
exception of a single restricted traffic announcement echo
used to pass important information to Nodes within a
Network.
10. Comments and Credits
[This section, copyright included, will be automatically
removed upon approval of this document.]
This document is based on version 2c of the WorldPol
proposal, with changes proposed by independent FidoNet
SysOps.
This document is not final. No FidoNet policy is or will
ever be. If you are interested in making changes to
FidoNet policy, please get involved!
This document will be adopted according to the mechanisms
provided in the present policy document.
This document was jointly developed by AT LEAST the
following:
Raul Artaza, Don Benson, Bill Bolton, Steve Bonine, Randy
Bush, Billy Coen, Phillip Dampier, Jack Decker, David
Deitch, Daniel Docekal, Ron Dwight, Luis Garcia-Barrio,
Hector Gomez, Tomas Gradin, Jackson Harding, Rob Hoare,
Jesse David Hollington, Alejandro Hopkins, Tom Jennings,
Glen Johnson, Daniel Kalchev, Raymond Lowe, Rick Moore, Bob
Moravsik, George Peace, Vince Perriello, Bob Satti, Jan
Stozek, Erik van Riper, Matt Whelan, and Gustavo Zacarias.
If anyone's name was omitted, we apologize and will be
happy to give them credit.
(C) Copyright 1992 by Pablo Kleinman and Jerry Schwartz.